From Reflexology Practice to Research Evidence: How to Report Interventions Effectively

How can reflexologists ensure that what happens in the treatment room is accurately and powerfully represented in published research? This seminar bridges the gap between everyday reflexology practice and the rigorous standards required to build credible research evidence. It also highlights the consequences of poor or incomplete documentation, including misinterpretation of interventions, reduced research quality, and the inability to replicate or validate findings—issues that will be examined and discussed in depth during the seminar. 

Drawing on findings from two recent studies that analyzed reporting quality in reflexology research and developed enhanced guidance for improvement, this session demystifies what “good reporting” really looks like. Attendees will discover how to translate practical skills, treatment decisions, and therapeutic intentions into clear, structured intervention descriptions that stand up to scientific scrutiny. By the end of the session, practitioners will understand how effective reporting not only strengthens the evidence base for reflexology but also elevates professional practice and supports wider recognition of the discipline.

Key Objectives

Following the presentation reflexologists should:

• understand the importance of comprehensive and transparent reporting of reflexology interventions in research, including how incomplete reporting affects evidence quality and reproducibility.

• apply key principles and structured guidance (including TIDieR-informed elements) to accurately describe reflexology interventions for publication or professional documentation.